I am writing this post, in response to Planet of the Monyets comment on my previous blog, "The Convenient Lie" which I appreciate very much, thank you (and also for the benefit or non benefit of my readers). I can't write all this in the comment box!!
I respect your view on the matter of global warming, and that you've attended most of the lectures on climatic issues. I was formally from the “boring” side too, (although I think skeptics are more regarded as “boring” since people would roll their eyeballs up their sockets in frustration, clearly bored, due to the inability to convince these skeptics to see their point of view) until something jilted me to research it myself and well, somehow I am quite convinced that this whole Global Warming Threat is a scam. Here’s why (let me bring you through my process of thinking).
Science is not about consensus, (we all are aware of the band wagon effects), I'm sure this is agreeable by many. Otherwise, people would still think the world is flat, and that the sun is rotating the earth, Samy Velu is not an act of God, and Badawi sleeps most of time of his Premiership because he was bitten by tse tse fly and not from just lack of stamina from the nocturnal activities from his new marriage.
What I understand from my research of earth's climatic change is that, we're actually in a period of what we call the Haloscene climatic optimum. Back then, they don’t have intense communication system whereby people sitting in the living room eating pop corn watching CNN in Batang Ai, knows that Houston Texas is snowing and Saudi Arabia experienced flood after a long time. In short, people back then carried on with life and adapting to the climate changes, quite oblivious to where it is going. What I’m trying to get at is, should we panic at changes in weather at this frame of time, and start carbon taxing people for instance, for something that may well be earth’s normal process anyway?
What is the actual issue here? The issue at hand is "Global Warming is a direct result from human activities, or termed as carbon foot print?" . Never mind the Carbon Tax soon to be implemented in continuation of the Kyoto Protocol are replaced with a more potent treaty now as we speak, at the Copenhagen Climate Change Conference 2009 .
It is correct to state that sufficient research have not been done to debunk the skeptics. But why is that? Why don’t the “alarmist” scientists give more chances to the "skeptics" to research or argue these "skeptic" allegations and debunk the facts, once and for all, and not to mention to give a broader broadcast for these debates? Why are there complaints from certain scientists that their views are being suppressed from being heard? I amongst many would have an open mind to accept facts if this case is debunked. After all, I don’t have any shares anywhere and I do not benefit from either global warming nor cooling. I hate cold weather, so I’d like to be prepared when it comes.
Perhaps these video may give us some light regarding why perhaps Global Warming is not a direct cause of human activities, is not given enough coverage, let alone chance of enough research done to debunk them:
Perhaps the lack of media coverage led "anti-climates" to hack into "alarmist" scientists emails and got them into sufficient trouble, well at least to delay the treaty currently ongoing in Copenhagen. (gee....rendezvous...that's what happens when mainstream media suppresses news and become biased...GE2008?). Enjoy these short videos;
- ► 2007 (44)
- ► 2008 (74)
- WORLD AIDS DAY 2009
- VISION 2012
- The Convenient Lie....
- Hi, I'm Pah Nur. I am a skeptic. Hi Pah Nuuuuuuurr...
- Every Human has RIGHTS...
- More on Climategate
- And here's a Climategate Christmas Video Release!!...
- NST Online bsmallCHANDRA MUZAFFAR/small/B BR1Malay...
- 2010 : The Year Of The Second WaveSSSSSS
- Ho! Ho! Ho!!!
- हैप्पी न्यू इयर
- Response to comment from Ocean Girl, thank you.
- Closing 2009...
- ▼ December (13)
- ► 2010 (53)
- ► 2011 (25)
- ► 2012 (18)