THOUSANDS OF FREE BLOGGER TEMPLATES

Words of Wisdom ...or so it seems...


VIDEO OF THE MOMENT

Tuesday, 26 January 2010

New World Order??

They say “History repeats itself”. (True. I'm still dating cruel men, albeit that is not what this post is all about. ) But have anyone questioned why? If you ask me, I’d say that “History repeats itself because we do not learn from them” ergo, we keep repeating the mistakes over and over again, expecting a different outcome every time, which is not going to happen by the way. In tennis, our coach had taught us that we needed to stop, take a deep breath then focus again, if we want to break the cycle of series of mistakes we make in a game.

Yes. History repeats itself because we allow it to. That is why history makers, not in a good sense of it, keep using the same old trick. I mean, why not, the public are ignorant and gullible for the same trick. Why teach a dog new tricks when it's entertained with the same old one.

What am I ranting about? Well, there’s a big hoo haa going on now regarding Mahathir’s speech implying that apparently the Jewish were the ones responsible for orchestrating the 9/11 attacks on the World Trade Center. Well, anyone who comments that he is senile obviously have not done any research on the matter and is commenting for the heck of commenting and jumping on the band wagon in order to look cool and sound amiable, just to fit into the bunch that is somehow outraged with that statement. Don’t get me wrong. I’m not a big fan of the Arabs nor the Jews.

The smart Arabs did the one brilliant move, which was to migrate out of that continent, amongst them, my great grandfather to which I owe him, my utmost gratitude. Otherwise, baju “kurung” would be my least problem.

The Arabs are not all that humane either, read their history full of blood shed if you don’t believe me. Having Islam trusted upon them, or so they claim, does not mean that they are immune towards scrutiny. For those who think embracing Islam is synonym to becoming an Arab, you may want to take a look at their history before committing to do so. A good book to read for this would be “Chasing the Mirage” by Tarek Fatah.

To understand the toxic problem we have today, leading to the 9/11 tragedy and the “war on terrorism” that followed, we need to go back to the roots of the problem. In medical line, we treat the symptoms in order to buy time exploring the root cause of any disease. Ultimately, to stop the disease, we need to determine and treat the root cause.

I would say, the root of the problem is British Imperialism. Great Britain granted us "Independence" but they never left, at least not in our minds. We have attained independence probably, but not yet freedom. If we are free, tell me then, what is the need for us to join the Commonwealth Organization and still be dictated by non other than the British Empire themselves? Even the Headquarters is in London, what does that tell you?

It's like the British Empire saying, "Oops, sorry we've buggered you people, let us hold hands now, how's your ass, still hurt? Oh let us let bygone be bygone and let the bugger and the buggered form a new club. Let's call it the Commonwealth" . Nothing common about the wealth though is there? Seems like that the only wealthy one in the lot is Britain, and of course we know where all that wealth come from don't we?

Then the British Empire seeped through the United States of America insidiously. If you have the patience and the curiosity, do click on the video below and take a good listen; This will give you a better understanding of the things to come.



In case anyone doubted the role of Zionists in all this, HERE is something for you to ponder on. I must emphasize that when I say “Zionists”, it does not completely and automatically mean “Jews”. There are Christian as well as “Jewish” Zionists. In fact, if you were to peruse the history of Palestine way back when they were known as the land of Canaan, (do click HERE part 1, HERE part 2, HERE part 3 , the Finale phew!! to find out. The link was courtesy of Walski, thank you Walski), you may be amused to the fact that the two parties fighting for that piece of land are basically those who have nothing to do with it when it was still known as Canaan.

As for the Zionists, well, as much as they’d like to claim that they are the pure keeper of Judaism and the fight for the promise land is what this is all about, they’re not. They are, in fact, not the people who originated from that land either. They were fraction of Serbs ( then under the Soviet Union) who embraced “Judaism”, a new sect of the original "way of living guided by their covenant with God" embraced by the actual Jews. In short, the "Jews" that are active in the Zionist movement are those who are Jews by convert, not by bloodline.

The actual Jews, like Albert Einstein(yes, yes, the guy who everyone wants to study his brains, but not his hair style) for instance was uncomfortable with the thought of zionism and their struggle to attain the alleged "Promised Land". I wonder which part of the promise that Abraham allegedly made that comprises of the command to kill others in order to get this so called "Promised Land".

In fact, Einstein, a Jew himself, had written to New York Times, pointing out their worries pertaining to the new emerging Zionist movement back in 1948. Here's the letter. The "Jews" who are active in the zionist movement are those originating from Khazar. Read the history of how the Khazars, originating from Khazaria embraced Judaism.

More on the root of "Zionists", and the plan of the Shadow Government when you click on the rabbit hole...



Today, they are referred to as Ashkenazim Jews. In fact, Chaim Wiezmann, the first President of Israel, and many Zionist leaders come form this Khazar lineage. Khazars are the lineal ancestors of Eastern European Jewry and it is a historical fact acknowledged by Jewish historians and religious textbooks as well. (Lilienthal, page 168 citing Heinrich Graetz,History of Jews and S.M. Dubnow, HIstory of Jews in Russia and Polland.)

Let's go back to the 9/11 event. There are many books out there that try to uncover the story behind 9/11 attack. A good book, explaining in detail why and how 9/11 is the job of a certain shadow power in which he termed as the AngloAmerican oligarchy would be one by Webster Griffin Tarpley in his "9-11: Synthetic Terror Made in USA" . You can either buy the book available here in Malaysia, or be a cheapskate and download it HERE.

Matthias Chang, former political advisor to Tun Mahathir and currently the advisor of the Iranian government wrote "Future Fast Forward" , which tallies with Tarpley's "conspiracy theory", in proving the existence of the Shadow Government/Oligarchy but Chang had taken it to the next level by detecting the Zionists as part of this shadow government. You'd be naive to think otherwise. Do read his book to learn how well he had connected these incidences. A brief outlook would be clicking onto Zionist influence on The US War Machine


For those who are wondering, what have 9/11 got to do with the "New World Order"? Well, let's put it this way. The world is run by a shadow government who's ultimate goal is to run the whole world, world domination. In order to do this, they have to be very powerful and controls basically almost everything. How do an organization do this? Simple, get more money to buy more power. That gained superpower will be used to gain more money and the vicious cycle resumes. Basically, the world is run by an organized crime. The same people who killed JFK. Another good book to read up on this would be "Final Judgement" by Michael Collins Piper. This book implied the Mossad, as the instigator behind the assassination.

After the defeat and the crushing down of the Communist block, Russia, these goons need money to sustain their lifestyle. So they needed new customer to buy their arms. Prescot Bush, grandfather of the Bush of the moron kind, was an establish arms dealer just in case you don't know. How did you think they became the rich tycoon ? That is why Bush Jr, can afford to remain an imbecile and spend most of his time playing golf instead of actually working in the office. Pointless to waste time in an office that can run on autopilot right?

Why did you think US went to war in Iraq. They were not concern about Sadam Hussain being a tyrant, they helped sponsor his atrocities back in Halabja by supplying him the chemical for that chemical warfare he had conducted. Both Bush Sr and Jr are members of the secret society "Skull and Bones". Hmm..that answers a lot about the mystery of Bush Jr....anyone who'd think skull and bones is the cooler name for a club, obviously did not think that the brains are important.

They needed to attack Iraq as part of the agenda to conquer the Arab world. Control the Arabs, you get the Oil. How do they get the American people to agree to go to war is by invoking a scene whereby they will think that their sovereign was under attack. They have to do it in American soil, in order to gain Allied back up, it is part of the deal of the Allies.

After the Russians were down, the oligarchies needed to create further income and what better way for arms dealer to generate income other than from war, and what better market to create a long term sustain market than the egoistic hardheaded megalomaniac Arabs eh? Those canggih arms need to be used and sold right. But alas! No more enemies to sell them to. Or so it seems.

"Terrorism" was created in order to create the excuse for preemptive war. Stop to think again. What constitute "terror" in an act whereby the US attacked and invaded Iraq on basis of "war against terrorism". It's unjustified to attack Iraq when the alleged culprit and architect of 9-11 is sitting somewhere in the caves of Afghanistan. The same Osama bin Ladin trained by the CIA to get the Russians out of Afghanistan. I find it ironic that the US can come up with super canggih gadgets to help detect temperature change, yet are unable to locate Osama sodding ladin. Or, are they trying at all? I mean, why bother with Osama when his very existence is a guarantee to the continuation and prolongation of "War on Terrorism".

The Arabs, sadly, made all this possible by keeping their balls in the pants, afraid that their love tool would be injured and that in turn will jeopardize their mega plan to propagate forth via polygamy. They are unable to unite and go against the real terrorists, instead help the actual terrorists rape innocent people instead, be it in a harlot or non harlot sense of it. It amuses me that all these Religionists cannot rise to the occasion when they needed to, Palestinians excluded. If only there is a viagra to aid the standing up to the occasion of fighting for what is right, in the name of Islam. The Arab elites are bought over by the oligarchies and the common people are left to suffer as a consequence. The ulama' were too busy guarding their own periuk nasi and formulating fartwas of trivial proportion and can't see 2 feet away towards the future of Islam. p/s and these are the jokers the Muslims in Malaysia look up to.

All these dumb Arabs could have done was to ignore the useless paper money of USD, at least for temporary measures until a long term plan is thought of. Turning their backs on USD and opting to trade oil in Euro would have sufficiently screwed the oligarchies, at least retard them on their track. But they do not have the balls to do so. They did have the plan to turn to Euro. If anything, the invasion of Iraq was a warning for them to change their minds. And that is why I say the Arabs leaders only have balls to procreate more imbecilic prototype. My suspicion is that the Arab elites have long been bought by the oligarchies....

How can the Muslim world unite, when they cannot agree on what constitutes "Islam" and go to war against each other in the name of that ill-defined "Islam". I give you Iran-Iraq war whereby the Muslim kills Muslims, both parties sponsored by the oligarchies...enough said?

So, considering all the reasons in the eyes of the greedy money making oligarchies to invade Iraq, I don't see why they won't.

"Theory of food scarcity", Peak Oil theory, 9/11, Climategate, are just the "jalankerja" in this crooked mathematics that will ultimately sum up to one and one result...THE NEW WORLD ORDER.

For those of you who is wondering what the hell is a New World Order, here's the "New World Order for Dummies"...take a listen.



And the video I posted below contains part of Lyndon LaRouche's speech in regards to the "New World Order". You can indulge in his 1 hours long speech HERE if you wish to.



Shadow government is like Tuberculosis. You have to have a very high index of suspicion to be able to detect them. Otherwise, just like TB, they will insidiously consume us. That is why another name for TB is "consumption".

As for us Malaysian, I'm no big fan of any politician in particular. As far as I'm concern, "All politicians are arshloch until/unless proven otherwise". But here's something that we should ponder. Any politicians who favors IMF, the bait use to enslave poor nations, have to be scrutinized.....the best way to avoid TB, is by not getting into contact with it....and to kill it before it kills us.....
(Rabbit hole ends here)
...Click here to find out how deep the rabbit hole goes.....

Friday, 22 January 2010

Wake Up Earthlings !!!!

Here's an update of the Climategate.
Click on :
Climate change : this is the worst scientific scandal of our generation.

Below, I've posted two videos there, the first is a snippet from the short speech given by Godfrey Bloom, a Member of the European Parliament for Yorkshire and the Humber for the United Kingdom Independence Party (UKIP), let the EP members now how he really feels about the climate change scam.

Take a listen to this short videos:



And this video will give you an idea of how similar we are to living in what is called "The Matrix".....your mind will not be at peace once you wake up to the reality outside the Matrix...Unfortunately, the Matrix offers "too good a life" that not many of us are willing to wake up and face the reality of real life...maybe because reality bites? In the case of Climategate, it bites you in the arse in a manner that, if we do not do something about it, you may have to pay tax to whatever carbon emission that comes out of those bitten butts.....

Wednesday, 20 January 2010

Onnu + Rendu + Moonu = (trillion USD) 2035

This post is made possible by an alert from my apt but terribly shy reader, who will not be happy should I reveal his/her identity. I shall thank him/her for the lead story by referring to him/her as W...thank you W, this one's for you.

______________________________________________

First it was the tempering of the data in East of Anglia University giving rise to the Climategate. Now, apparently the the IPCC had miscalculated the timing of the predicted melting of the Himalaya, by 300 years. Frankly, this reminds me of the mamak stall, whereby, every time they miscalculate the bill, and unlucky enough to get caught by a meticulous customer, it will never be miscalculated less...always more. It's some kind of a Mamak Stall rule of thumb or something.

Needless to say, the IPCC had miscalculated the melting of glaciers making the Himalayas to "supposedly melt to oblivion ergo disappear" in 2035 instead of 2350. How convenient. Hmm...300 years...that's probably an average of nearly 4 reincarnations of a human life....and I lost count with cats' lives. This whole miscalculating here, and miscalculating there is beginning to smell like a plot of thickened kari basi...

After all the profit bagged from Carbon Tax, the culprit behind the Al-Gore's Global Warming most likely won't be around to be prosecuted. They won't be around to listen to their name being tarnished in history. What's in a name when you can bag in billions and die a filthy rich man right?

Do read the article below;

CLIMATEGATE: HIMALAYAN GLACIERS MELTING DEADLINE A MISTAKE. or maybe In Timesonline

Here's a point to ponder. How can scientists predict when a glacier will melt, when they cannot even predict when a volcano will erupt?

Why am I dragging the volcano into this? Well, apparently, volcanic eruptions causes decrease of global temperature. Do click on effects of volcanic eruptions on global climate in pdf (this may take a while to download but a worthwhile browse) or in Scientific American's "How do volcanoes affect world climate?" to find out by far, how past volcanic actions have managed to decrease the global temperature by a certain degrees.

Whilst quasi periodic climate patterns such as El Niño and La Nina have mixed impact on global temperature, e.g, El Niño may decrease or increase the global temperature whilst La Nina decreases global temperature one cannot really come up with a prophesy of a volcanic eruption. It'll be like a tarrot card read gone bad really.

As much as the world mourns for the loss of lives and the suffering of Haiti people due to the recent unfortunate quake, this earthquake may reduce the global temperature to a certain degree. We do not know how many more earth quakes that will erupt in the future, and I'm sure the scientists can't predict this either. So what if the earthquakes are the negative feedback to the global climate, forming a kind buffer to the increasing global temperature. Will this not mean that the global warming may not reach the predicted catastrophic level?

But I have to add, should the increase temperature cause the volcano to erupt, which by the way the matter have been raised but not proven, then perhaps it is our duty to explore beyond the alleged carbon cause of global warming (of which is disputable), to find out the real cause and spend our time and energy combating the real cause, should there really be one that the universe cannot "kaotim"...and of course, this is assuming we are entering global warming and not global cooling.

Wonder what else will emerge "miscalculated" in the future....the intelligence of IPCC?

Thursday, 14 January 2010

Paying it forward....

I never did understand my dad at one point of my life. Then again, I was a teenage on rebel without cause mode back then. Teenagers are capable of understanding their parents only when they suffer from precocious puberty. Having to cope with one’s hormones was a problem handful enough, deciphering parents was definitely, another. When you’re a teenager, you get angry too fast, sad too fast, excited too fast, and according to my guy pals, horny too fast(of course you’ll never catch them dead admitting this when they were teenagers). Those were the days when we get excited over a new pair of, well, during my time the in thing was roller skates, not blades, kindly take note, thank you.

If someone were to pay me a million (err…Euro, not rupees) to go back to being a teenager, I would most likely decline, unless of course, they are willing to pay me a billion. While teenagers get too fast at everything, we adults get too fat too fast from just living. I know, I know, they say above 40 years old, you’d finally manage to put your head together only to have your body falling apart. Oh, the irony of life.

Amongst many of the disagreement, that had sometimes escalated into heated arguments and eventually not talking to each other for some time, (which didn’t make any difference to my dad because he’s the Kimisabe type, strong and silent. Come to think of it, I was more annoyed about him not noticing that we were not talking to each other, more than the not talking itself!!!) was that he had refused to send me, or any one of his kids to boarding school.

Being a kid and was all about hypes, I was a bit pissed off when he did not allow me to go to MRSM. I watched in dismay as my good friends at school left for the glamorous boarding schools. I’d fumed and agitatedly wondered to myself, “Hello, more boys to compete with and to prove once and for all, women are smarter…. What is wrong with that old man?” (So, okay, no horny hormones there, I was a late bloomer). We never did have that “father to daughter talk” for him to explain to me, why he did not allow me to go to the boarding school. Oh yes, bring it aaawwwwwnnnn, I was mighty prepared for answers should he confronted me, hey, I was in the debate team, I can take on adults. I’ve got them answers….. Teenage answers of course.

Later, as I grew up, and learn about the world evolving around me; the bitterness and sweetness of reality of life, that never cease to bite you in the ass, I somehow comprehended what my dad had achieved by his silence and inaction. And when you learn something through experience and deriving the facts of life on your own, it sounded louder than what could have been told to you by your parents, way years ago. I guess teenage hormones drowned many voices with the deafening resulting irrationality.

Now, as I observed my kid’s educational development, I practiced the same thing that my dad had. I refused to send her to the boarding school. Only this time, I did not have the problem of a raging teenager disagreeing with me on this one. Unlike me, she wishes not to get there. My reasons are purely moral based – that the boarding schools are meant for the under privileged, regardless of race. I wish not to partake in an act that condones the abuse of NEP. It’s that pure and simple.

My kid's reason was much simpler. She was not willing to part from my cooking and my sponge-like ability to listen to her ranting 24/7 about something or everything. The word, "shut up!!", was definitely not invented by my family. We do tend to utter, "shut the fish up!!" but under our breaths and you can’t call that rude, if you cannot catch what was said.

Another reason for my not being keen in sending my kid to boarding school, is that they basically comprises of 99.7% Malays, as good as a vernacular school. Like condoms, it's 99.7% protection from associating with other races. I'm never comfortable with that. Even in my job interview, when ask about my preference of where I'd like to work, my first choice was, "a metropolitan setting". I'm living that choice now.

There are other reasons, but to state them, would make this verbiage, a super verbiage and it would be good if I can come up with something that people read and learn instead of leaving it halfway unread.

I believe that there should be ONE education system and am dead against vernacular schools, and private schools. This one standardize school should cater for the development of all races, meaning there should be extra classes to maintain and nourish the diverse culture of Malaysia. There may be non BM non English classes whereby all Malaysians may pick out of pure interest and passion. Needless to say, that the school may finish at later timing. Classes should be limited to a small quantity of students so that the teachers can cope with the load. They can be dedicated at this one school, without having to make ends meet, or create more income from tuition. Our children need not go for tuition, if the education system is superior. Tuition takes up quality time spent interacting with parents. We need to teach our children, to have a balanced quality of life, and not to be kiasu.

Of course, needless to say, we need to start with upgrading the standards of teachers. All this is achievable. What is in doubt, to be achievable, is our desire to achieve it. And that is why, this kind of thinking, the kind that has the potential to create a true diverse but ONE Malaysia, does not materialize, because no politicians are sincere to carry out these simple tasks. I mean, why should they? It’s political suicide, insidious death, they might as well strap themselves up with C4 or a Malatov cocktail (made such a way that it’ll actually blow up and serve it’s purpose….clearly, a Malatov cocktail that had failed to detonate is a reflection of our sub-standard education system!!), and blow themselves up.

Race based, religion based parties feed on racial and religious sentiments. They grow stronger when interracial and inter-religious relations go weaker. In turn, these political parties ensure the education system stay as they are right now, because even though it is not working for the rakyat, it is working well for them. This system would generate more rakyat who are suspicious of each other based on religion and race, who in turn would vote for them, and it becomes nothing but a vicious cycle, circling slowly towards deterioration of this country. One day, we will all wake up and find ourselves in a fetid sinkhole, so deep, we’d just get frustrated to change and learn to be comfortable in an abyss of dung. Political parties should be based on humanity, full stop. You don’t need religion, or to be of certain race to recognize humanity. You just have to be human, that’s all. An atheist would surprise some of the “righteous” fellas with their understanding, and more importantly, act of humanity. What good is bragging religiousness when you act as though you are not enlighten.

Don’t give me that crap to say there is not money to change our education system. Like time, you create money, not wait for it to happen. The will has to be there of course. We all know that what’s lacking in our political scenario is the will to do the right thing. If we can send an astronaut, (well, Russians call him cosmonaut, and we Malaysians are still struggling with gay-or-not), to the moon recording blow jobs in space (well, what would you call experimenting with blowing bubbles in space powered by tax payers’ money? Screwed right?), why not invest that kind of money to create a really solid education system, designed to integrate yet maintain the diverse culture of Malaysians?

Imagine how even more unique our country would become should we manage to break this vicious cycle and pull this through!! For those who had fallen into the abyss of no imagination, no thanks to our lifestyle invests materialistic endeavors rather than invest in ourselves as humans, well, now is the time to get excited and throw an attempt at imagination. If you can’t, than this totally proves our education need resurrection!!

Maybe what I’m saying is far fetched. Maybe it’s just “wishfoooool” thinking. But every achievement starts with a dream. If Martin Luther King were to be given life today, he would re-die immediately from a heart attack, shocked to see part of his dream had come true. Obama may not be perfect, but he was part of King’s once upon a dream.

As for my dad.....in his own Kimisabe silent ways, he had managed to convey from his actions, more loudly than that of his words....I thanked him by paying it forward….

Friday, 8 January 2010

SACRILEGE !!!!!

Update : 090110@9.14am

Please take time to peruse this petition, HERE and ideally, sign it. Thank you...

___________________________________________________________________


Why do people fight and go to war?
We tell our children that there are two reasons why people go to war;

* to better their way of life


* to protect their way of life


I would, however , add in one more reason. - Because despite claims of human being evolved, we are, some of us, primarily,ANIMALS.

Otherwise, we can have better way of lives, and/or protect our way of lives without having to go to war. In civilization, war and violence is not an option.

The same applies to people who uses violence as a method of resolving issues. People who enjoy violence, are useful tools for those who prefer to use brain mass rather than muscle mass to achieve personal gain. How do you think the handful filthy rich oligarchies of the world have managed to maintain their lifestyles if not for creating new wars to boost sales, namely firearm sales, to sustain them?


I was reminded by this when my eyes were feasted upon today morning's news whereby 3 churches have been attacked. This quote may give you a general idea who did it;

"Inspector-General of Police Tan Sri Musa Hassan confirmed the attacks, saying the first attack was by motorcyclists who threw a helmet filled with flammable liquid at the Metro Tabernacle Church in Desa Melawati, causing a fire that burned books and chairs near here, at midnight. Its administrative office was gutted in the attack."


Judging by the method of other attacks apart from the one mentioned above, it may have been executed by bored Mat Rempits who cannot afford to merempit the extra mile due to the rise of petrol, for all I care. It could be punks hired by the "brains" hiding behind their muscles.

One thing remained evident, that those people who attacked the churches are DEFINITELY ALL MUSCLE, because they cannot be having that much content of brain to execute such act and not even be able to get a basic home made bomb like Malatov Cocktail to blow up.(which is a great blessing of course). It sound very Malay indeed, can never get something done with 100% achievement at first attempt, no need CIA or Interpol to aid investigation in this one. Buy a Proton car if you dare disagree with me.

The main question remained to be answered is, WHO IS THE BRAIN behind the muscle? You're looking at the wrong blog if you're looking for this answer. I'm merely pointing out that this may be a political issue more than it is, a religious one. My suspicion is that there are certain parties who would love to make ISA so very relevant due to this incident. Just an intuition....that and past history..Sadly, there are still people falling for this tricks it's no wonder politicians remain corrupted politicians and civilians remain screwed.

My job is to hail every Malaysian to realize that we don't have to fall for the same trick over and over again. Let's not be the pawns in their chess game. Let us not allow them to use our sentiment on religion and race, to get what they want. 13th May was nothing but a coup to out-stead Tunku Abdul Rahman because he was getting too cozy with the idea of a sincere One Malaysia.Haven't we learned anything from history? (actually, history was distorted.....so I take back my question)


I will start by offering my deepest and sincerest apology to my fellow Christian brothers and sisters for the sacrilege act that is clearly against true Islam or any religious teachings. The Quran clearly stated;

[2:114] "And who doth greater wrong than he who forbiddeth the approach to the sanctuaries of Allah lest His name should be mentioned therein, and striveth for their ruin. As for such, it was never meant that they should enter them except in fear. Theirs in the world is ignominy and theirs in the Hereafter is an awful doom."

In simpler English ;
2:114 "Who are more wicked than those who prohibit God's temples; so that His name not be mentioned in them; and they seek their destruction? It is they who should not be able to enter them except in fear; they will have humiliation in this world and in the Hereafter a painful retribution."

Again, in Surah al-Hajj: 39-40,Allah said;

“To those against whom war is made, permission is given (to fight), because they are wronged – and verily Allah is Most Powerful for their aid – (They are) those who have been expelled from their homes in defiance of right – (for no cause) except that they say, ‘Our Lord is Allah’. Did Allah not check one set of people by means of another, there would surely have been pulled down monasteries, churches, synagogues, and mosques, in which the name of Allah is commemorated in abundant measure. Allah will certainly aid those who aid his cause, for truly Allah is full of strength and might.”

Yes, Muslims are encouraged to retaliate when oppression stare them in the face, but never to INSTIGATE violence. Islam establishes a relationship with the people of different faiths on the basis of tolerance, justice, benevolence, and mercy.

[Surah al-Mumtahanah: 9-10]

“Allah forbids you not with regard to those who neither fight against you for your faith nor drive you out of your homes from dealing kindly and justly with them, for Allah loves those who are just.”

Unjust have been committed by these hooligans powered by, well, we have yet to establish this entity. But for now, I plead my fellow brothers and sisters, be you Muslims, Christians, Buddha, Hindus, Jews, atheists who believe in justice and humanity, let us stand together to condemn this act of treason towards humanity!!!Let us say a prayer, in our own ways, a prayer to our God, the same God, to give us strength and patience to overcome this ordeal, and for God to unveil the truth of who are behind this barbaric act.

I'm sure there will be similar versus in the book of all religion, something similar to that of that stated in our Quran

(Al-Ma’idah 5:8)
;

"{O ye who believe! stand out firmly for God, as witnesses to fair dealing, and let not the hatred of others to you make you swerve to wrong and depart from justice. Be just: that is next to piety: and fear God. For God is well-acquainted with all that ye do.}"


The cause, or rather, excuse for this whole mess is "the usage of Allah in Catholic context", but why resort to violence when there are other civilized grounds that can be utilized? It all comes down to this:


[Surah al-Ankabût: 46]

“Argue with the People of the Scripture in the best manner except those among them who act oppressively. Say: We believe in the revelation that has come down to us and in that which came down to you. Our God and your God is one, and it is to Him we submit ourselves as Muslims.


*** For the record, "Islam" simply means "submission to God, the One and Only", so basically, "Muslims" are "submitters"

Let us stay together, make One Malaysia ours, not theirs.....

Here are the related posts:


Walski's tongues-1condemnation.


Anas's burning-of-places-of-worship-and-quran.

Marina's e-mail call-from-marina-mahathir. and latest update on arson attacks of churches


art-harun's our-failings

Last but not least, here's what we can learn from the species we are supposed to have evolved from Planet of the Monyet's
Quarrel, quarrel, quarrel

Wednesday, 6 January 2010

One-"Allah".......no?

The whole of Malaysia have been talking about the victory of Herald Tribune in the case of using “Allah” in their article. That’s right, everybody’s talking about it, until something as equally or more irritating such as "CIA using their so called supercanggih technology to aid climate change detection" (yes, CIA; the same jokers who boast high and mighty technology, and yet, are unable to use the supercanggih technology to locate Osama bin Ladin...) comes along to divert our attention.

That is how, quietly, topics like "Who demolecularized Altantuya...I mean, really" or "Mystery of the Disappearing Engines", "Rafidah and the AP" , "Mystery: will Rosmah be the next Monalisa piece when painted" (except we already know why she's not able to lift her lips to give a full smile because her whole face have already been lifted, nothing mysterious about that), and many more Malaysian Mysteries like "Samy Vellu", and we have a new comer, "Nazri" (why can't he just shut up?) that gets buried into Malaysia's own X-Files.....

Despite the Ministry of whhhhateverrrrrrr's urge to bloggers and webmasters to "stop fanning flames", never mind, who the fire starter was (HaaatttttccccccHome ministrychooooo!!! Allah bless me, thank you...oh yeaaaaa ....Now the Christians can say "Allah Bless You"...says the court...oh but wait..Judge Datuk Lau Bee Lian had ruled that usage of the word was constitutional as long as the periodical was confined to educating the followers of the Christian faith., okay, I'll stick to "God bless me" for now), I'll blog anyway, even if it means I'm "fanning the flames" because, if bloggers were to listen to the authorities in the first place, it would beat the purpose of blogging right?

If it is not for blogs and websites, and if we were to rely on mainstream media, I'm sure Siong Tet would not be able to tell us that Sarawakian Christians have been using the word "Allah" even from before Malaysia was formed and Dr Lim Teck Ghee's (the director of the Centre for Policy Initiatives) article may not even be published on mainstream media.

I don’t believe in a New Year’s Resolutions, but in keeping with the society’s spirit of New Year, I guess I’d use this opportunity to do away with expletives that naturally comes to mind when reading about these types of issues. To me, if anything, this is more of a political issue, rather than a religious one. To me, it’s like the Auta…I mean authorities acting like dogs pissing on trees…basically an act of marking of territories….when one has the power, not to mention the resources to pee a lot, why not eh?

The Muslims have forgotten to whom Allah had revealed His Deen which was through His Books of Revelation.

[2:41] And believe in that which I reveal, confirming that which ye possess already (of the Scripture), and be not first to disbelieve therein, and part not with My revelations for a trifling price, and keep your duty unto Me.

They are dedicated to mankind, not for just Christians, Muslims, UMNO, PAS (kecewa atau tak kecewa, nasib lar), dan kawasan kawasan yang sewaktu dengannya.

2:213
"Mankind was one single nation, and God sent Messengers with glad tidings and warnings; and with them He sent the Book in truth, to judge between people in matters wherein they differed; but the People of the Book, after the clear Signs came to them, did not differ among themselves, except through selfish contumacy. God by His Grace Guided the believers to the Truth, concerning that wherein they differed. For God guided whom He will to a path that is straight."

The word “Allah” had been used by certain bibles since the 19th century, and in the book of Shri Guru Grant Sahib, the Sikh’s would probably be laughing at the Muslims for our ignorance right now. What is there to be surprised about? There is one God, therefore His book comes from ONE source - Him. Why should he not avow His name in them? Obviously He wanted mankind to refer Him as Allah, amongst many other names... Dr Asri agreed with me on this matter ;-D, and here's a mind opening article from Anas.

[2:151] "Even as We have sent unto you a messenger from among you, who reciteth unto you Our revelations and causeth you to grow, and teacheth you the Scripture and wisdom, and teacheth you that which ye knew not."


Unfortunately, the thing that grew in the majority was the air volume in the brains, not the grey matter content. Problem is, we, the Muslims are arrogant to think that we have the power of possession of God’s name, perhaps because we cannot hear God tell us whether he minds it or not? But He did tell us, in the Quran. Islam has it’s roots all the way to Abraham and beyond. Book of revelation had been given in the form of Taurah, Zabur, Injil and the Quran.

[2:136] "Say (O Muslims): We believe in Allah and that which is revealed unto us and that which was revealed unto Abraham, and Ishmael, and Isaac, and Jacob, and the tribes, and that which Moses and Jesus received, and that which the prophets received from their Lord. We make no distinction between any of them, and unto Him we have surrendered."


Naturally Allah would have referred Himself as "Allah" to them too, after all, it is one of His names.

17 :110: Say: “Call upon Allah, or Call upon Rahman; By whatever name ye call Upon Him, (it is well): For to Him belong The Most Beautiful Names...."

Not only are we the Muslims arrogant, most of us are ignorant in regards to our own religion and take for granted that Allah is only looking at our way, that it is just about us, no one else maters, and that only the Muslims will go to heaven. We take for granted that Allah had left us in charge of others. Well, even if He had, obviously this whole “Allah is only to be called by Muslims” fiasco is a show of power abuse.

(2:62)
“Those who believe (in the Qur'an), and those who follow the Jewish (scriptures), and the Christians and the Sabians,- any who believe in God and the Last Day, and work righteousness, shall have their reward with their Lord; on them shall be no fear, nor shall they grieve”.


More as you enter the Rabbit Hole...


Islam authorities claims that the use of “Allah” in bible is to confuse the Muslims. Read what Marina has to say about being Confused-cious....Frankly, we don’t need the Christians to confuse us, as we’ve done a good job confusing ourselves when we adapt 4…or maybe 5 mazhabs to choose from. I mean, who’s to decide how many mazhabs should there be in the first place. Why not 6, 7,8 mazhabs and so forth. Being majority and getting to decide what is right and what is wrong based on hearsays does not mean that you are in the right. Just like science, religion is not about consensus. In fact it’s the opposite of consensus as evidenced by 6 : 116.

"Wert thou to follow the common run of those on earth, they will lead thee away from the way of Allah. They follow nothing but conjecture: they do nothing but lie."


Besides, God guides whom he wishes because only He knows who is good and who is bad. Humans get buggered by hypocrisy. If you have love in your heart for God and Mankind, it's a bit difficult to get "confused". Even if The Book of Revelation have "failed you", there's simple common sense. Atheists deciphers humanity probably more that those who have religion, and I find that rather ironic.

Rapera may either enlighten you, or confuse you even more, depending on what you've decided in your mind before reading THIS.

And what about the Christians, Sikhs, sentiments? Don't you think that it'll be even more confusing for them since "Allah" is primarily, in this country used by the majority Muslims?
If anything, it is them who should be more worried about getting their followers confused. Ever thought of it that way? No? Perhaps it's because we Muslims are too self centered and self indulgent? We think the whole world belongs to us and only us, and sometimes treat others like they are space occupying lesions. We treat Islam as though it belongs to the Muslims, who inherited religion, not by choice, but by chance. We treat Islam as though it belongs to us, not to mankind.

Furthermore, is it JUST, to prohibit mankind from calling Allah by His name, something not exclusive to the Muslims?

Surah An nahl surah 90

"Allah commands justice, the doing of good, and liberality to kith and kin, and He forbids all shameful deeds, and injustice and rebellion: He instructs you, that ye may receive admonition."

I believe the term suitable for this is myopic. Instead of calling mankind towards embracing Islam by using beautiful words, we apply methods of imposing power in order to get the same task done. And yet we get overzealously angry when someone pointed out that Islam was spread via the tip of the sword.

Nahl: 125

"Invite (all) to the Way of thy Lord with wisdom and beautiful preaching; and argue with them in ways that are best and most gracious: for thy Lord knoweth best, who have strayed from His Path, and who receive guidance."

Exactly what message is sent to mankind when we are hostile towards who gets to call God by one of His name, making it exclusively ours?

We were thrilled with One Jamban (well, not so thrilled about this One), One Malaysia, One Utama, so why not One-"Allah"? (one referring to sharing "Allah" as a name of The One God). Stop being One Kiiiinnnnnnd only lah.....Come on Malaysians, we can do better than this. Let's not let religion split us because all religion, at the core, tells us that we are one, ergo try to unite mankind, we do not need race based parties to tell us this (and do something else behind our backs). Our methods may differ, but we pray to the same God, One Allah.

Related posts;

Do take a vote at Walski's Poll (not pole for dancing, unfortunately)

and Nizam Bashir wrote an interesting article, "The Greatest Trick the Devil Ever pulled"
The Rabbit hole ends here
...Click here to find out how deep the rabbit hole goes.....